the world's first civilizations

pre-history ancient civilizations:

bolivia: ancient remains. metal alloy of tungsten and steel, not discovered until 1930 with furnaces hot enough to combine the 2 metals.

the underwater ancient site off the coast of japan.

when plato was 11, he over heard his teacher, socretes, speaking with visitors from egypt. they told a story of a fabulous civilization that was destroyed by a great flood

egypt: sphinx and pyramids, layout for constellation orion (osirus) and leo, but to the time of 10,500 bc, not 5000 bc, 3000 bc or the time the pyramids were built, but to a previous time.

under water off the coast of india? there's even evidence of a man-made land bridge from india to sri lanka. in their oral history, it is not city/civilization of altlantis, but "ramayana" that is destroyed by flood.
www.hinduism.co.za/oldest.htm

history channel fact: 8000 bc to 14000 bc the world's water was held up in ice during the last ice age and the water level was 70 to 80 feet less than what it is today. during 8000 to 14000 bc there were 3 great super floods when the ice melted and re-froze and melted again. there are over 600 hundred ancient myths of great floods throughout the world.


could it be that atlantis, as plato wrote down from oral tradition, was not just one city or small island, but a name for the whole world that was flooded when the ice melted, increasing the sea level by 70 to 80 feet?


why doesn't anyone look at the larger, global picture of these ancient clues? it's just so obvious. is this hypothesis just too radical? it goes against the grain from the mainstream, but so did galileo and capernicus when they said the earth wasn't the center of the universe. do archeologists value their careers over fact and truth? isn't there job to discover the truth? what actually happened so many years ago? scientists have recently discovered that during roman times the first mechanical computer, eye and brain surgery, steam power and industrial revolution mechanical labor saving devices had all been discovered 1700 years before general history recognizes these discoveries. 1700 years! isn't it possible that a global flood could have destroyed these inventions much earlier than that? excommunicate if you will, but look at the pieces, these pieces of unrecognized history, these remnants of civilizations past. you cannot continue to ignore that they exist. if we could only acknowledge that there may be more to the story, we could at least study them and discovery either way what happened so many years ago.



more to come, like more details and bibliography, etc......